[Dirvish] [PATCH] btrfs support

Dominik Schulz lkml at ds.gauner.org
Wed Dec 15 08:45:38 UTC 2010

Am Montag, 13. Dezember 2010, 14:07:09 schrieb Adrian von Bidder:
> On Monday 13 December 2010 13.25:06 Paul Slootman wrote:
> > On Sun 12 Dec 2010, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > > link-deest option makes sense, IMO, because:
> > You're forgetting that there still is a LOT more than linux out there.
> > Dirvish is used on all sorts of unixen. They don't have the advantage of
> > btrfs.
> > Hence I'm wondering whether it's advisable to integrate this into
> > dirvish, or to create a new tool based on btrfs. After all it's quite a
> > different approach to the problem.
> All the rest stays exactly the same, I don't see a big difference.  Dirvish
> still probides the whole framework to call rsync, do logging, error
> handling, expiry, which it does very well.
> (And: Isn't ZFS another FS with cow snapshots?  So perhaps I do a variant
> of the patch with an option "cow" that could be empty or set to "btrfs"?)

The patch looks fine to me and I that sounds reasonable to me.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.dirvish.org/pipermail/dirvish/attachments/20101215/52af668b/attachment.bin 

More information about the Dirvish mailing list