[Dirvish] dirvish-expire very slow
lkml at ds.gauner.org
Sat Jan 17 14:16:24 UTC 2009
Am Freitag 16 Januar 2009 01:44:28 schrieb Richard:
> Eric Searcy wrote:
> > Arjan Schrijver wrote:
> >> Hi list,
> >> Is anyone experiencing this same problem?
> >> <snip> after the backup we
> >> start dirvish-expire, which takes about 6 hours, and sometimes even up
> >> to 10 hours or more.
> >> Is this normal? It seems to me that analyzing directory names and then
> >> deleting them shouldn't take this amount of time.
> >> Can anyone explain this to me?
> Switching from reiserfs to ext3 gave me a BIG performance boost in
> dirvish-expire. Reiserfs is VERY SLOW to expire files in my experience.
> (yet another reason for me to avoid using reiserfs with Dirvish)
Filesystems tend to have a very high impact when deleting huge filetrees. I
have rm often run several hours on ext3 when removing big directories. You
should try out XFS if that is faster for you since it has generally a better
performance when deleting than ext3.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.dirvish.org/pipermail/dirvish/attachments/20090117/fe3d7405/attachment.bin
More information about the Dirvish