[Dirvish] Reply-to for dirvish list

Paul Slootman paul at debian.org
Tue Dec 28 01:30:56 PST 2004

On Sun 26 Dec 2004, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> The "reply-to" for dirvish is currently set to original mail poster
> only, as the "mailman" tool suggests.  This means that to respond to
> the list, you must use a "group" reply ( "g" in mutt ) rather than a
> simple reply ( "r" in mutt ), which responds only to the "reply-to"
> of the original mail poster.

I always add mailing lists to the 'subscribe' list in .muttrc, so I can
use L to reply to the list, irrespective of what's in the reply-to...

> Many lists I subscribe to have mailman configured for "reply-goes-to-list",
> which leaves the original email poster's reply-to intact, but adds a
> reply-to for the list.  I prefer this behavior myself, but some of you
> may have strong feelings against it.  What is your opinion?

I find having a reply-to to the list by default preferable. I've often
received personal replies to mailing list messages by accident, and that
just wastes everyone's time.

Paul Slootman

More information about the Dirvish mailing list